- From: Steve Harris <swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:02:23 +0100
- To: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
- Cc: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 27 Apr 2009, at 09:50, Ian Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> > wrote: > A lot of the hairyness of xmlsig comes from the transforms. I prefer > signing something nice and concrete, whether XML, RDFa or JSON. > > What % of "linked data" is truly free of bnodes? > > Well, anything in the Talis Platform for a start :) > > I think a good proportion of the linked data created since the LOD > project started is bnode-free. Obviously many other pre-existing > datasets are not. No, and not everything in the LOD world is bNode free either. With my RDF storage hat on they're a pain, but as a content creator, they're really handy. Arguably some intermediate concepts in the LOD world don't need/want stable identifiers either, but I don't really think I want to argue that point :) - Steve
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 09:03:49 UTC