Re: advice on modeling an XBRL fact as a triple

That's perfect! (I was afraid that the answer would be simple enough to 
be embarrassing. I've never used rdf:value before.)

thanks,

Bob

KANZAKI Masahide wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> 
> How about using rdf:value ?
> 
>> If the use of the rdf:type object as a predicate is not a good idea, is
>> there some convention (i.e. an existing predicate from an existing ontology)
>> to represent the PCDATA of an element that has attributes that are also
>> being represented by triples?
>