actually i am not a big fan of ontologies. infact i think trying to fit data into some ontology might be wrong. the problems are that ontologies are overly restirctive if they are finite and well defined and if they are ambiguious then they are not ontologies. eg. take the general example of one's parents. its very normal to have ontology with parents defined as one father and one mother but what happens to the case of surrogate mothers, or doner fathers/mothers etc. and what happens to the adopted kids. how can be their parent relationships be represented completely with any well defined ontology ? on the other hand only using RDF without any creating any relation to some associated ontology might be a complete system. if ontology is finite and well defined then it won't be complete and if its not well defined and not finite, well then i would say its not an ontology. ravinder thakurReceived on Thursday, 23 October 2008 16:03:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:33 GMT