Phil Archer wrote: > Henry, all, > > I've jumped back to the start of this thread to raise an additional > concern/use case about the whole issue of data portability and privacy > protection. > > I've been told many times that once asserted, an RDF triple persists > until the entropic heath death of the universe. Therefore any privacy > protection system that depends on triples, at least in theory, cannot > support the rather human practices of growing up, changing one's mind, > changing jobs etc. > > If I allow my e-mail address to be seen by anyone who is no more than > 2 hops from my FOAF file, I would want that check be carried out in > real time so that if I deleted someone from my FOAF file, the > permission would not be granted. But does this break the Semantic model? Phil, Simple answer is: No. > > In the POWDER WG, with help from Jeremy Carroll, we've defined a > semantic extension to make it possible to put an expiry date on > triples [1]. Can something like this be worked into data portability? > > I could back this up with a nice gentle "I've changed job so no more > e-mail about its staff social functions please" but here's a more > scary one: > > Imagine a teenage girl who is being abused at home. She uses her > social network to call for help. Luckily, she finds it and manages to > escape the dangerous home life. Now she wants to keep in touch with > her new support network but become invisible to her former abuser. She assumes a new Identity via a new URI in here new Social Space. > > In short, any privacy control needs to support changing circumstances. One URI dies and another is born :-) Kingsley > > Phil. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20080317/#temporalSE > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.comReceived on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:54:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:33 GMT