- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:10:26 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>, Chris Wallace <Chris.Wallace@uwe.ac.uk>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
On 29 Jul 2008, at 15:41, Guus Schreiber wrote: > Bijan Parsia wrote: >> On 29 Jul 2008, at 15:08, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: >>> Making something like pub:name a subProperty of rdfs:label is >>> essential >> Hardly essential. > > On what evidence do you base this statement? In our application > projects we make extensive use of subproperties of rdfs:label. You cut at the wrong place. > Guus > >>> for the Tabulator It's not *essential* for the Tabulator. I would argue that *this way of marking* display properties isn't essential either. It may be unchangable legacy right now. But the functional difference between displayName rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label. and displayName annotatedToBeOfType DisplayInDetailView is not great. Actually, it's better in the latter. Tim said that we should change modeling to accommodate Tabulator and the OWL DL systems should be modified. But one could as easily put things other way round and ask Tabulator to change. (Legacy *user* issues are different, IMHO.) Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 15:08:07 UTC