On 10 Jul 2008, at 13:23, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > >> (The link under "miserably" is: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ >> >> ) >> >> It's not just a marketing problem, of course :) > > Seems we are in good company. The other four links are: > > "W3C has failed" -> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/ > "Over" -> http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/ > "over" -> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work > "over" -> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ CSS seems the best. I'm not sure how good company the others are :) Cheers, Bijan.Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 12:43:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:29 GMT