> From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net> > [ . . . ] > Clearly that atom in the content has to be interpreted as a literal, > otherwise a feed with a number of entries saying contradictory things > could produce on GRDDL extraction a nonsensical graph. Would named graphs help here, i.e., having one named graph per entry? http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 19:14:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:29 GMT