- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:12:26 +0000
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
> From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net> > [ . . . ] > Clearly that atom in the content has to be interpreted as a literal, > otherwise a feed with a number of entries saying contradictory things > could produce on GRDDL extraction a nonsensical graph. Would named graphs help here, i.e., having one named graph per entry? http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 19:14:08 UTC