On 29/02/2008, Richard Newman <rnewman@twinql.com> wrote: > I'd rather use imperfect tools, and improve them over time, than hunt > with flint spears until the perfect knowledge representation system > comes along. To return to the original email: SKOS is doubtless > imperfect, but it's better than the current alternative (rolling my > own), and it doesn't prevent Azamat from going off and building > something better. +1 Reminds me of something danbri said in a similar thread about 4 years ago: Traveller: I'd like to find my way to "Semantic Web", please. Bystander: Well... I wouldn't start from here. -- http://dannyayers.com ~ http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 11:42:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 29 February 2008 11:43:02 GMT