Re: Thing and Class

I browsed through the W3C documents, and didn't find that particular 
assertion.
But it is clearly true, since every class is a subclass of Thing.

Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Wallace" <mwallace@3SigmaResearch.com>
To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Cc: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Thing and Class


>
> Richard H. McCullough wrote:
>>
>> Since  Thing  subClassOf  Class;
> Would you please give your reference for this assertion?
>> and     Class  subClassOf  Thing;
> Would you please give your reference for this assertion?
>
> Thanks,
> -Mark
>> it follows that  Thing  equivalentClass  Class;
>>
>> So, I say:  get rid of Class!
>>
>> Dick McCullough
>> Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
>> mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
>> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
>> knowledge haspart proposition list;
>> http://mKRmKE.org/
>>
>
> Mark Wallace
> Chief Architect & Ontologist
> 3-Sigma Research, Indialantic, Florida, USA
>
>
>
>
>