W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Comments on "The OAI2LOD Server: Exposing OAI-PMH Metadata as Linked Data"

From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:41:19 -0400
Message-ID: <fbb7c5df0804271241r11eb4c87sc0f7eeeee6c338d4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hugh Glaser" <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: lac <lac@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Bernhard Haslhofer" <bernhard.haslhofer@univie.ac.at>, "bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at" <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at>, "SW-forum Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "MacKenzie Smith" <kenzie@mit.edu>, "Ian Millard" <icm@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:


>  >> But we should not lose sight of the fact there are a lot of other things
>  >> to be identified in an OAI repository. Having URIs for people, in
>  > particular,
>  >> is crucial. As far as I can see, the ability to uniquely identify an
>  >> author and editor has not been a strong issue in the OAI community, and
>  > we need
>  >> to encourage it.
>  > That's not fair. Name authorities are a big concern for librarians and
>  > 'repositarians', it's just that they have in general lacked a technical
>  > infrastructure for dealing with name<->id translation. And in a
>  > predominately google age that lacks LD services, little in the way of
>  > technology push for implementing them.
>  OK, agreed. Put it your way.

I wouldn't be so quick to diplomatically brush this aside. The library
world is finally taking steps into the semantic web [1], but there's
still a lot of work to do here, and making name authorities suitable
for the 21st century has to be a big one.


[1] see Ed Summers' really excellent new work on converting LoC
subject headings into linked data <http://lcsh.info>.
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2008 19:42:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:04 UTC