- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:00:17 +0100
- To: "Adam Sobieski" <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "Valentin Zacharias" <zacharias@fzi.de>, semantic-web@w3c.org
Hello! > > Yes that does add some sophistication to what I've been considering for a > HistoryNet project. I'm looking at ontology to create events and weave them > together so users can add and interconnect them to create meaning, such as > for data resembling the history of knowledge science project I championed, > which weaves a conceptual thread from cave paintings to modern tech. I see > your point though for some of the older contributions, such as cave > paintings. You might want to check the event ontology we use in the music ontology. The namespace is: http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl# It is a really simple ontology, and you can see concrete use of it in the datasets published using MO (Musicbrainz, dbtune, etc.). There is a small description of it in [1]. Cheers, Yves [1] http://moustaki.org/pubs/Raimond-ISMIR2007-Submitted.pdf
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 09:00:26 UTC