Re: rdf standards?

For the biologists, there's our project: the Neurocommons.
http://sciencecommons.org/projects/data
http://sw.neurocommons.org/

All of the OBO ontologies are available in OWL, BTW not just GO.
OBI is developed natively in OWL http://obi.sourceforge.net/


-Alan

On Sep 4, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Renato Golin wrote:

>
> Frank Manola wrote:
>> Renato--
>>
>> While I understand that the Primer list was created some time ago,
>> nevertheless that list contains some applications that use RDF (PRISM
>> and CC/PP are examples) that are not on your list, and your original
>> mail said your goal was "to list which applications already use  
>> RDF and
>> for what" (i.e., it did not seem to rule out any particular kinds of
>> applications).   Unless the applications listed in the Primer have  
>> since
>> *ceased* to use RDF (or no one actually uses those applications), it
>> would seem to me that they are still relevant to your list.
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> I'm not ruling anything out, I was just trying to bring a list of
> applications people here would know.
>
> Although for me (ex-mobile developer) CC/PP is quite interesting it  
> does
> not raise eyebrows in the bioinformatics community. The same with
> engineering case.
>
> The PRISM case is far closer because we have close association with
> journals' lists and in fact we need a good standard for that right  
> now.
>
> Anyway, I've just linked both URLs (primer and usecases) to my
> presentation so both listings will be on it.
>
> Btw, I can send you the presentation later if you're interested...
> nothing super fancy and only a small part of the 'RDF day' here with
> lots of other presentations.
>
> thanks,
> --renato
>
> -- 
> Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 16:05:59 UTC