On 10/18/07, Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com> wrote: ... > When discussing the RDF version of VCard on this list, we spent weeks > arguing about whether the vcard.familyName property should take a single > value or a list, because value order might be important. With URF, the > issue is moot. You can order any property, and only use urf.List when > you're actually talking about a list of things. You can see that this > problem doesn't come up at all in the URF VCard ontology at > <http://www.urf.name/vcard.turf>. Question: are the difficulties around these issues in RDF a consequence of the open world assumption, and the need to be able to merge statements from disparate graphs? BruceReceived on Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:57:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:53 GMT