On May 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Garret Wilson wrote: > The only point left to consider here is the "value-switching" in my > current document, allowing vcard:firstName, for instance, to be a > literal, an rdf:value bnode, or an rdf:List of rdf:value bnodes. This goes to that question of complexity that I and Harry were mentioning. I strongly support Norm's original decision that the name properties (among them not firstName, BTW) ought to be literal properties restricted to a maximum cardinality of 1. E.g.: <v:VCard rdf:about="http://ex.net/1"> <v:fn>J. Edgar Hoover</v:fn> <v:sort-string>Hoover, J. Edgar</v:sort-string> <v:n rdf:parseType="Resource"> <v:given-name>J. Edgar</v:given-name> <v:family-name>Hoover</v:family-name> </v:n> </v:VCard> I think treating personal name parts as resources in a collection is gratuitous complexity. BruceReceived on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 16:30:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:47 GMT