Ian Davis wrote > > On 25/06/2007 16:00, John Black wrote: >> >> Now I can talk directly about, or mention, that FOAF URI in RDF. >> >> <http://kashori.com/ontology/MyURI> str:numOfCharacters 41. >> > > Unfortunately not. That's a statement about the resource the URI > identifies, not about the URI. Perhaps you didn't read my post carefully. And then you snipped the relevant passage[1]! The URI http://kashori.com/ontology/MyURI (try it, it works) which has 33 characters, identifies the resource http://kashori.com/JohnBlack/foaf.rdf#jpb, which has 41 characters, and is represented by the web page returned when http://kashori.com/ontology/MyURI is de-referenced. As far as I can tell, everything is strictly legal. 1. """Now my FOAF URI is this http://kashori.com/JohnBlack/foaf.rdf#jpb. As a URI, it is an information resource, namely a string of characters conforming to rfc3986. I have created a web page representation of this information resource at http://kashori.com/ontology/MyURI according to standard REST web architecture principles. As the owner of and therefore the authority about the referent of that URI, I hereby proclaim that this web URI denotes my RDF FOAF URI, http://kashori.com/JohnBlack/foaf.rdf#jpb. This uses web technologies to identify that FOAF URI by another URI. In particular, as an information resource, something that can be completely characterized by a message, I can identify it directly with a 'slash' URI. I don't need a 303 or a 'hash' URI.""" John www.kashori.com > Ian > -- > work - http://www.talis.com/platform > play - http://iandavis.com/blog > callto:ian_davis >Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 17:03:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:02 GMT