Harry Halpin wrote: > Is it indeed difficult or impossible to write a SPARQL query over > rdf:List, particulary with the use of owl:sameAs as in: > > <vCard:additionalNames rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <rdf:Description owl:sameAs="Edward"/> > <rdf:Description owl:sameAs="Reeves"/> > </vCard:additionalNames>. > > Can someone tell me precisely why and if so, does rdf:Seq help? > When answering this question, I don't think it's necessary to think in terms of owl:sameAs, because RDF allows literals in lists, as Sandro pointed out. (Thanks, Sandro---I had let the RDF/XML serialization cloud my thinking, and didn't realize that this was available in the RDF model.) I think that the lack of literals in rdf:List in an RDF/XML serialization will be irrelevant, one way or another; I don't think that should affect the analysis. I'd be interested in knowing the answer to this question concerning literals in lists using SPARQL, as I don't (yet) use SPARQL. GarretReceived on Saturday, 28 July 2007 06:47:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:04 GMT