- From: Michael K. Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:18:27 -0500
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- CC: Linking Open Data <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Frank Manola wrote: > On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Michael K. Bergman wrote: > >> Chris Bizer wrote: >>> Hi Frank, Pat and Bernard, >>> thanks a lot for all your ideas and comments. >>> So what we are having on the table right now is a definition: >>> "The term XXX refers to the description of a non-information resource >>> that a client obtains by dereferencing a specific URI that identifies >>> this non-information resource." >> >> Stand back and read this sentence to yourself three times. >> >>> and various proposals for the term: >>> Pat Hayes: >>> - represented description >>> - redirected description >>> - redescription >>> - transmit >>> - infon >>> Frank Manola >>> - associated representation >>> Bernard Vatant: >>> - description >> >> Can't we just kill the term "non-information resource" once and for >> all? All it does is obfuscate understanding and resolution. >> >> Mercy be upon us when we try to actually communicate with the public >> outside these forums. >> > > Why the qualification to "outside these forums"? Have you noticed how > much traffic the issue has generated *inside* these forums ever since > the distinction was made? +1 -- ______________________________ Michael K. Bergman Web Scientist 380 Knowling Drive Coralville, IA 52241 mailto:mike@mkbergman.com 319.339.0110 skype:michaelkbergman http://mkbergman.com ______________________________
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 16:45:23 UTC