- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:51:40 -0400
- To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, "Linking Open Data" <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>
On 7/22/07, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > I think Roy's work is by far the best and definitive account of the > things we now call information resources. But it does *not* account > for any of the new stuff we're doing with URIs these days. Web > architecture has evolved since Roy wrote his thesis. Unfortunately, > many REST proponents are still stuck in the pre-httpRange-14 past, > and are likely to remain there for a few more years. Ok, I'll bite. Why can't Roy's definition of resource accommodate the "new stuff" you're doing with URIs? I don't see any reason why it can't. IME, the definition has proven itself to be incredibly robust, even when - in fact, *especially* when - using Semantic Web technologies. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Monday, 23 July 2007 02:51:46 UTC