Re: caching HTTP 303 responses

Alan and other disputants,

I believe that my  reaction  to your correspondence might  reflect not only 
my personal  sentiment, though i try to utilize any idea, good or bad. To be 
frank, the specific issues you are so hotly discussing are not so exciting 
as you might think. Hardly this dispute over niggling details might be 
interesting for the Semantic Web Community. For the Semantic Web and its 
underlying Ontology ask for a fundamental discussion, and the greatness of 
the idea of Ontological Web can't be lost in the lilliputian details, 
however technically significant.
But you are always free to dispute the subject of ''catching HTTP 303 
responses'' between each other, reporting the agreed results to the 
Community.

Azamat Abdoullaev
EIS Intelligent Systems LTD
Paphos, Cyprus; Moscow, Russia
http://www.eis.com.cy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>; "Jeremy Carroll" 
<jjc@hpl.hp.com>; "Giovanni Tummarello" <g.tummarello@gmail.com>; 
<semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: caching HTTP 303 responses


>
> Who is the authority for making statements about authority?
> -Alan
>
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 7:40 AM, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
>
>> Perhaps an assertion like this:
>>
>> <owl:Ontology about="">
>>   <ex:authoritativeForNamespace rdf:resource="&dc;"/>
>> </owl:Ontology>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 21:17:02 UTC