- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:18:58 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: 'Semantic Web' <semantic-web@w3.org>
Question to all ... On 5 Feb 2007, at 07:46, Harry Halpin wrote: > What do people think? Keep it in OWL? Are all the cardinality > constraints Norm has right? > > Or move it to RDF and throw cardinality constraints out the window? Well, the case for staying with RDF/S is pretty clear -- keep it simple. What's the case for going OWL? What compelling features could we build into applications that would be impossible or much harder if there are no OWL cardinality constraints in the vCard vocabulary? Cheers Richard > > > > > > -- > -harry > > Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh > http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426 > > >
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 09:19:26 UTC