FWIW, RDF Forms are intended to target this problem space as well. http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/05/RDF-Forms/ Mark. On 12/19/07, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > > Tim, > > On 19 Dec 2007, at 15:54, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > > Is there an RDFS Class of SPARQL endpoints? > > Semantic Sitemaps are a minimalist extension of Google's Sitemap > protocol [1], which is XML-based, and not RDF. So at the moment we > don't define RDFS classes. > > Once our basic spec is finalized, we will look into making a matching > RDF vocabulary and GRDDL transform. This would be nice because of > RDF's natural extensibility, and there would be natural synergies with > POWDER. This vocabulary would of course include a class for SPARQL > endpoints. > > Richard > > [1] http://sitemaps.org/ -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.comReceived on Thursday, 27 December 2007 04:18:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:54 GMT