- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:54:42 +0000
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Chris Richard <chris.richard@gmail.com>, Steffen Staab <staab@uni-koblenz.de>, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, p.roe@qut.edu.au, j.hogan@qut.edu.au, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Story Henry wrote: > My feeling is that RDF/XML is very close to being a good format, Yes, I tend to agree, but I think it is in some ways illusory and frustrating because I don't think there is a good XML format for RDF. In fact there may not be a good textual format for RDF at all - it is somewhat too general. GRDDL from more specific formats maybe a better solution, but then you may loose the extensibility of RDF .... Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 12:55:15 UTC