W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2007

Re: RDF/XML and named graphs

From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:06:42 +1000
Message-ID: <a1be7e0e0712171606i430d4267p117d629dac22ebdd@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fabien Gandon" <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Cc: p.roe@qut.edu.au, j.hogan@qut.edu.au

Just skimming through that submission it is unclear why one would want
to publish a document which included sources from multiple different
graphs interweaved. Is this document an authoritative reference for
the triples from each of the graphs? Could you definitely retrieve the
graph source from its original definition and match the definitions?
Duplicating information seems to lend itself to hazards with importing
two graphs into the same store...

It would however be very helpful if it was your desire to augment the
original graph without having the authority to do so.

Peter

On 18/12/2007, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> W3C just published a member submission that may be relevant to this
> discussion:
>
>     RDF/XML Source Declaration
>     Submitted by INRIA on 06 September 2007
>     Published on 17 December 2007
>     http://www.w3.org/Submission/rdfsource/
>
>     Submission
>     http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/
>
>     W3C Staff Comment
>      http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/Comment
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 00:06:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:19 GMT