Re: xml:base (was Re: IRI meets RDF meets HTTP redirect)

On 20/04/07, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
>  > This situation is an interoperability mess.
>
> I don't think it as bad as it might appear.

It may be 'workable', but if you guys are having to jump through 4 specs
to find an interpretation, which is still open to debate, what hope for users?

Don't be surprised if you see various interpretations showing up in the wild.


It needs clarification, ideally in the source document, informatively
if not normatively.

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Saturday, 21 April 2007 08:45:49 UTC