Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) scripsit: > I guess an approach that depends on routinely ignoring xml:id processing > errors and not validating the XML does not seem to me like a wise design > choice, A matter of opinion and/or taste. People do routinely work with invalid XML documents, which is the whole reason for introducing xml:id; xml:id processing errors reintroduce a little bit of validity, which is why processors SHOULD report them for those who care. But there is no MUSTard about what XML applications do with such errors. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam. Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam. --Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank YouReceived on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 21:06:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:47 GMT