W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2006

Re: RDF Profiles in Link Values

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:08:50 -0800
Message-Id: <0BFE48FF-8805-4DE4-B30D-99678BE40BED@bblfish.net>
Cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>

On 17 Nov 2006, at 06:25, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Sean,
> My 0.02: Ignore the titles, or take them just as a very broad  
> hint. Load all files typed application/rdf+xml with potentially  
> interesting hints, and inspect them to see if there is any data you  
> want. The data is self-descriptive for a reason.
> That's what schema-agnostic clients will do anyway.
> Yes, profiles might make things a bit more efficient for schema- 
> specific clients, but I wonder if it's worth the hassle. Unless I  
> hear anyone say, "All these FOAF files are killing my DOAP  
> crawler!", I will conclude that the proposal tries to solve a non- 
> issue.

I do think it is an issue. I like to do things right when I do them,  
and having semantics in the title seems to be misusing the title  
attribute. One can always argue for doing this less well, and that  
they work. After all the current tag soup of a web does kind of work!

In Atom the rel attribute is defined like this:


The value of "rel" MUST be a string that is non-empty and matches  
either the "isegment-nz-nc" or the "IRI" production in [RFC3987].  
Note that use of a relative reference other than a simple name is not  
allowed. If a name is given, implementations MUST consider the link  
relation type equivalent to the same name registered within the IANA  
Registry of Link Relations (Section 7), and thus to the IRI that  
would be obtained by appending the value of the rel attribute to the  
string "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/".

]] http://www.atompub.org/rfc4287.html#rel_attribute

So I would suggest that a future spec of the link attribute do the  
same for this html link, and that in the mean time you use a rel  
relation different from alternate that is a relation between a  
document (the doc in which the link appears) and some object.

So the following would seem to make sense to me:

<link rel="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator"
       title="created by"
       href="http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#me" />


> Richard
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 16:35:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:54 UTC