- From: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:36:54 +0000
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: 'Semantic Web' <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 10/03/2006 20:38, Harry Halpin wrote: > I was wondering, perhaps it would be useful for the W3C or some > standards body to "endorse" one of the simplified XML syntax choices for > RDF and a compact notation ala Turtle ... I agree. And we're close with the syntax for expressing query patterns in Sparql. It wouldn't be too much work to extract the RDF bits from that spec and package it up as an official non-xml syntax for RDF. Of course it would end up looking the same as Turtle given that's where it came from. Ian -- http://internetalchemy.org | http://purl.org/NET/iand Working on... Silkworm <http://silkworm.talis.com/>
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 21:42:57 UTC