- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:11:16 -0500
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:58 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:46:47 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:33 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote: > > [...] > >> So it seems to me that you're happy with the earlier point that CURIEs > >> is "a way of abbreviating URIs"? > > > > No. > > I don't understand. That is the aim of CURIEs. What is there to disagree > with? I disagree that a system where "Each language must specify... [a variety of options, in prose]"[2Jun] is one implementable algorithm for abbreviating URIs. [2Jun] CURIEs: A proposal, 2 June 2006 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Jun/0007.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:11:28 UTC