- From: David Powell <djpowell@djpowell.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:06:06 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, atom-owl@googlegroups.com
Monday, June 26, 2006, 11:28:03 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> Does Atom allow parameters in its @type attribute? > I don't think so: see paragraph 4.1.3.1 > "but MUST NOT be a composite type" That's not what "composite type" means. Composite type is defined in RFC 2045 as "message/*" or "multipart/*". (I have no idea why types such as message/rfc-822 were banned in Atom). >> How should RDF vocabularies refer to mime types that include >> parameters? >> >> It is all a bit vague, I find it easiest just to model the mime type >> as a Literal property. > agreed for non TEXT relations. Text relations can clearly be > immediately converted to Literals, I was referring to the mimetype property itself, not the content. -- Dave
Received on Monday, 26 June 2006 23:06:27 UTC