W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Semantic content negotiation (was Re: expectations of vocabulary)

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:26:17 +0200
Message-Id: <10CF23D7-C24F-4811-A414-0D30AEC1D993@bblfish.net>
Cc: "Xiaoshu Wang" <wangxiao@musc.edu>, "Golda Velez" <gvelez@webglimpse.org>, "Reto Bachmann-Gmür" <reto@gmuer.ch>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>


On 26 Jul 2006, at 00:58, Danny Ayers wrote:
> On 7/26/06, Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu> wrote:
>
>> Use the right tool to do the right thing and carry it out at the  
>> right
>> places.
>
> Quite. Partitioning of the data server-side can reduce overheads, and
> this can be achieved transparently (by using optional headers). What's
> not to like :-)

One thing to look at would be: how is this going to affect caches?  
All the caches need to be aware
that this header has an effect on the representation returned.

This is probably a discussion in part for the HTTP working group, no?

Henry

> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> -- 
>
> http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 06:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:11 GMT