Le lundi 07 août 2006 à 10:26 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit : > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:59 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > > Dan > > > Ah... I misread your point. Indeed, in the general case, > > > lots of documents may discuss the same resource, and none > > > of them is authoritative. If DOC1#T1 and DOC2#T1 both > > > refer to France, there is no web architecture mechanism > > > for determining which is authoritative. > > > > > OK. But I don't want to have DOC1#T1 *and* DOC2#T1 as two distinct URIs > > defining France. I want one URI to define France. > > Do you have any serious expectation that you will get it? i.e. > that you can somehow stop other parties from coining URIs that > refer to France? Of course not but in our case both DOC1 and DOC2 are published by the INSEE and I don't see the reason for a single entity to coin different URIs for the same concept. Eric -- GPG-PGP: 2A528005 Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online. http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Monday, 7 August 2006 15:58:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:54 GMT