I suspect this is an area in which URIQA could be useful -- put a URIQA handler behind the ontology portion of the address space, and let it return useful RDF for the request URI. This works best for resources without fragIDs, of course; for resources with fragIDs it might be good to supplement the CBD with "and any term with a fragment under this URI", though URIQA has workarounds in the spec[1]. -R [1] <http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html> On 4 Aug 2006, at 6:13 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > SemWeb people need to think long and hard over > this one, and most importantly, make some *tools* to make the job of > maintaining semantic web data at URIs easy.Received on Saturday, 5 August 2006 03:53:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:54 GMT