W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Integrating Ontologies & Argumentation

From: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:22:08 +0100
Message-ID: <e8aa138c0604180822j64e9534i1e5063404f03feec@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Matt Williams" <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk>
Cc: jena-dev@yahoogroups.com, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Matt,
Thank you very much for the very interesting report on your work. I have
read it through and it does, indeed, seem to be a very promising approach
with real potential value (as I imagine) to your intended users.
It will be very interesting to evaluate what happens when professionals
without prior agreement, try to form a clinical opinion using a tool based
on these sorts of methods for DSS.
Since you are combining this approach to logic with ontology descriptions it
readily could have applicability outside of the medical field.
Adam

On 18/04/06, Matt Williams <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> As some know, I am working on integrating ontological information with
> arguments. I have just submitted my mid-term report for my PhD Thesis
> committee, and it is available at:
> http://acl.icnet.uk/~mw/MattWilliamsMTR2006.pdf for anyone interested.
> It's a little light on detail, but provides some high and mid-level
> descriptions of what I've been doing.
>
> Comments welcomed.
>
> Matt
> --
> Dr. M. Williams MRCP(UK)
> Clinical Research Fellow,
> Cancer Research UK
> +44 (0)7834 899570
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:22:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:14 GMT