Chris Wilper wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I'd suggest you take a good look at Kowari. It really excels > at query performance and scalability compared to anything > else I've seen in this space. My own testing has been in the > 10-20M triple range. I've heard that Kowari can easily > handle ten times that, but haven't tested the assertion for > myself. This runs counter to our experience. While Kowari had initially faster loading times than other databases, it quickly ran into memory problems before we'd managed to load our entire dataset. We also encountered problems with database corruption and management issues (e.g. taking regular backups). We ended up using a relationally backed store as we got the benefits of a stable backend (management tools, replication, backup, etc) with the RDF model. Cheers, L. -- Home: http://www.ldodds.com | "Simplicity is the ultimate Blog: http://www.ldodds.com/blog | sophistication" -- Leonardo da VinciReceived on Thursday, 15 September 2005 11:12:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:08 GMT