* Extensibility. * Logical foundations. * The OO way is not necessarily the right way to do things. Much more thorough answers will be forthcoming from the rest of the community :) -R On 25 Oct 2005, at 21:18, Xavier Noria wrote: > > In RDFS and friends properties do not "belong" to classes, whereas > in OOP normally they do. For instance, if you've got an instance of > foaf:Person you cannot assume there's any assertion about > foaf:interest for him. > > Which is the rationale behind that choice? > > -- fxn > > >Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 20:22:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:48 GMT