W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2005

Re: New Intro to RDF

From: Joshua Tauberer <tauberer@for.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 18:47:09 -0400
Message-ID: <434457ED.6010101@for.net>
To: David Powell <djpowell@djpowell.net>
CC: "Hammond, Tony" <T.Hammond@nature.com>, "'SWIG'" <semantic-web@w3.org>

Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
 > you might want to specify that the labeled graph reppresentation
 > of RDF is an approxiamtion and works just in certain cases since
 > labels ... can be subjects or objects of rdf annotations.

Good point; will do.

David Powell wrote:
> You could also consider tag: URIs
> http://www.taguri.org/07/draft-kindberg-tag-uri-07.html
> They do use the existing domain name registry as an authority.

Great.  I knew of tag:, but I had wrongly assumed the authority part of 
the URI must be an email address followed by a YYYY-MM-DD date, which 
seemed a bit verbose.  Now that I've read the spec, I see the only 
required thing in a tag: URI over my suggested URI format (a scheme 
equivalent to http: except with a different name) is the year, which is 
great.

Thanks for pointing out tag:.  I'll use that.

-- 
- Joshua Tauberer

http://taubz.for.net

** Nothing Unreal Exists **
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:47:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:46 GMT