Re: Why Literals should be unique and why this is a serious issue

Hi Leight,


thanks for you reply.

You are absolutetly right and Im allready aware about the 
FunctionalInverseProperties.

But, since I think the same-concept-dublication problem is a 
fountamental problem, there should also be an appropriate functionality 
even in RDFS(S) and not only in owl (full).
Thats why I used rdf in the example code.

cheers,
Andreas


Leigh Dodds schrieb:

> You can, using Inverse Functional Properties:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#InverseFunctionalProperty-def
>
> To define a literl as being InverseFunctional you have to use OWL Full.
> But the support is already there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
>