Hi all, most ontologies I have seen use some namespace, then a hash or slash and then more or less englisch terms. These last parts look like tags, the first part - the namespace - is then the context. I am right now designing a wiki system that lets the user enter RDF statements in a notation similar to tag tag "a longer tag" (s) (p) (o) I use "any text" "other text" "more text" and upon page save in the wiki each string is given a unique uri. This creates rdf like this: _:1 rdf:value "any text" _:1 rdf:value "other text" _:1 rdf:value "more text" _:1 _:2 _:3 If a string is the value of two or more uris, the user is prompted to choose among the available uris. I think this could lead to a very easy to use user interface without loosing "uri-precision" in disambiguating terms. Probably such string-to-uri service should be a REST-ful webservice... Ok, that's I all, I just wanted to make the point that tagging not neceassaryly means ambiguos data. Regards, Max -- University of Karlsruhe, AIFB, Knowledge Management Group room #258, building 11.40 mvo@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de +49 721 608-4754 www.xam.deReceived on Thursday, 24 March 2005 02:21:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:05 GMT