- From: Max Voelkel <max@xam.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:59:19 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi all,
most ontologies I have seen use some namespace, then a hash or slash
and then more or less englisch terms. These last parts look like
tags, the first part - the namespace - is then the context.
I am right now designing a wiki system that lets the user enter RDF
statements in a notation similar to
tag tag "a longer tag"
(s) (p) (o)
I use
"any text" "other text" "more text"
and upon page save in the wiki each string is given a unique uri.
This creates rdf like this:
_:1 rdf:value "any text"
_:1 rdf:value "other text"
_:1 rdf:value "more text"
_:1 _:2 _:3
If a string is the value of two or more uris, the user is prompted
to choose among the available uris. I think this could lead to a
very easy to use user interface without loosing "uri-precision" in
disambiguating terms. Probably such string-to-uri service should be a REST-ful
webservice...
Ok, that's I all, I just wanted to make the point that tagging not
neceassaryly means ambiguos data.
Regards,
Max
--
University of Karlsruhe, AIFB, Knowledge Management Group
room #258, building 11.40
mvo@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de +49 721 608-4754 www.xam.de
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 02:21:39 UTC