RE: true/false in RDF? from Joshua Allen on 2005-03-16 (semantic-web@w3.org from March 2005)

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:02:20 -0800
To: "Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>, "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: "Seth Russell" <russell.seth@gmail.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E5204883C09@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> > unspecified?  And of course, all of it means I *need* RDFS (and
OWL),
> > *everywhere*.  Why take such a huge dependency if you don't need to?
> 
> So if you have 8 boolean properties, you need a minimum of 8 classes
(or

If I use Boolean URIs, I don't need *any* classes.

I'm struggling to see the value in modeling this in any way that
requires more than zero classes (or OWL) to be defined.

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:02:33 UTC