- From: Seth Russell <russell.seth@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:01:21 -0800
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Imho, there is no such thing as "semantic meaning". There is only
semantic meaning to some agent(s). It is just as easy to make some
agent respond to
"<http://foobar/page.html> <urn:myterms:isCached> true"
as it is to the URI form or the typed literal form. The "right way"
is the fastest way that gets lots of different developers using the
same form.
Sigh ...
thispost assertcontext rdf, folksonomy, sementic+web, semenglish.
Seth+Russell
aka Bozo+Faust;
blog <http://bozofaust.blogspot.com/>, <http://can-you-hear-me.org/>.
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:16:36 -0800, Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I've decided that I want to use URI object values for my Boolean triples,
> rather than the literals "true/false". In other words, instead of:
>
>
>
> http://foobar/page.html urn:myterms:isCached "true"
>
>
>
> I want to use:
>
>
>
> http://foobar/page.html urn:myterms:isCached
> http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/true
>
>
>
> I can find zero examples of the latter; only the former. But I think the
> latter is right. Why am I wrong?
--
Seth Russell
http://speaktomecatalog.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 20:02:07 UTC