Re: true/false in RDF?

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:04:52 +0100, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch> wrote:
> 
> I would redefine the ontology to say
> http://foobar/page.html rdf:type urn:myterms:CachedObject

Yep, I suspect this approach would make inference easier with a
general purpose reasoner.

You might also want to add something like:

urn:myterms:CachedObject owl:disjointWith urn:myterms:UnCachedObject

Cheers,
Danny.
-- 

http://dannyayers.com

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 12:13:44 UTC