W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2005

RE: Constraining Collections?

From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:13:34 -0500
To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: "'Brian Manley'" <manleyr@telcordia.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00e101c52982$5359ab80$6401a8c0@gsclaptop>

Yeah, that seems cleaner (and less likely to freak out dls?).

rss:Channel rdfs:subClassOf 
 [ a owl:Restriction;
  owl:onProperty rss:items;
  owl:allValuesFrom 
   [rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Seq,
    [a owl:Restriction;
	owl:onProperty rdfs:member;
      owl:allValuesFrom rss:item
    ]
   ]
  ].

- Geoff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Dan Brickley
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:00 PM
> To: Geoff Chappell
> Cc: 'Brian Manley'; semantic-web@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Constraining Collections?
> 
> 
> Quick side thought: does having rdfs:member help at all?
> It is superproperty of _1 _2 etc...
> 
> Or perhaps OWL is a little class-centric in design, with
> fewer property-oriented facilities?
> 
> Dan
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:14:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:45 UTC