W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Vocabs for annotating media files?

From: Oscar Celma <ocelma@iua.upf.es>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:56:55 +0200
To: danny.ayers@gmail.com
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, rss-media@yahoogroups.com, <ipodder-dev@yahoogroups.com>
Message-Id: <20050623115655.5e50c421.ocelma@iua.upf.es>

Hi, 

Roberto Garcia proposed, in [1], a version of (the whole) MPEG-7 in OWL.
The problem is that is not a "fairly simple vocabularies/languages/formats"...

Cheers, Oscar.

[1] http://dmag.upf.edu/ontologies/mpeg7ontos/


On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:28:01 +0200
Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni@wup.it> wrote:

> 
> Danny Ayers wrote:
> 
> >Anyone happen to know of any existing, fairly simple
> >vocabularies/languages/formats for annotating media data? Something
> >that might be expressable like:
> >
> ><media rdf:about="http://example.org/wedding-speech.mp3">
> >   <segments>
> >      <segment> 
> >          <start>00:00</start>
> >          <end>12:00</end>
> >          <description>The groom's early deliquencies</description>
> >          <transcript>Unaccustomed as I am...
> >...
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Danny.
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> Mpeg-7 in xml is really heavyweight  and i wouldnt know how to make it 
> work with rdf directly. The lightweight (experimental?) owl version 
> seems more like it http://metadata.net/harmony/MPEG7/MPEG7.rdfs   ops 
> its rdfs, but there might be an owl version somewhere. I am unsure why 
> this file isnt liked from the harmony project itself.
> 
> Giovanni
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 10:48:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:05 GMT