Re: Identity of URIRefs / Resources from Henry Story on 2005-06-06 (semantic-web@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:28:08 +0200
To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
Cc: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-Id: <0914644E-2AA9-4753-8FBF-E3D86310A72D@bblfish.net>

Does this not get even a little more complicated with the  
introduction of IRIs?

Don't know much about IRIs other than that Atom is using them currently.

Henry

On 6 Jun 2005, at 14:26, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
>
> Jimmy,
>
>
>> Note that <http://gmuer.ch/aÃ¼> is not a valid URI can can never  
>> be a resource
>> name.  The string <http://gmuer.ch/a%C3%BC> is a valid URI and so  
>> can be a
>> resource name.
>>
> Why is the first an invalid Resource name? I agree that it is not a
> valid URI, but as I understand rdf-concepts resources are  
> identified by
> URIRefs and http://gmuer.ch/aü is a valid URIRef. Both URIRefs resolve
> to the same URI but they identify two distinct resources.
>
> reto
>
>

Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 13:28:17 UTC