Dan Brickley wrote: > RDF/XML parser owners: see below for a little test case that might flush > out a > potential (if minor; this idiom isn't widely used) interop problem. Rio[1] also failed this test. A fix will be included in the 1.0.5 release. Thanks for reporting this. Our new implementation resolves relative base URIs against the base URI of the context. If the "root" xml:base directive contains a relative URI then it is resolved against the document URI. I guess this is the way to do it? >>> <?xml version="1.0"?> >>> <rdf:RDF xml:base="http://example.org/" >>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22- >>> rdf-syntax-ns#" >>> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> >>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/" xml:base="test1/"> >>> <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> >>> <dc:source rdf:resource="test2/"/> >>> <dc:relation rdf:resource=""/> >>> </rdf:Description> >>> </rdf:RDF> [...] >>> ps. the dc:relation thing is in there because >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0234.html >>> via >>> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base tells me that >>> "" self-refs aren't >>> affected by xml:base. Not sure if that decision got reverted. Note that the response to this issue[2] states: "The WG decided that RDF will convert such references to absolute URI's and will take in scope xml:base attributes into account in such conversions." The revised RDF/XML syntax spec[3] is in agreement with this: "In RDF/XML, a fragment identifier is transformed into a RDF URI reference by appending the fragment identifier to the in-scope base URI. The empty string is transformed into an RDF URI reference by substituting the in-scope base URI." Guess this means that self-refs /are/ affected by xml:base directives. -- Arjohn [1] http://www.openrdf.org/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0234.html [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-baseURIsReceived on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 09:36:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:07 GMT