W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Typo: "apllication/rdf+xml"; broken mailer

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:32:21 +0100
Message-ID: <43AC34A5.7040609@gmuer.ch>
To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
CC: W3C Semantic-Web list <semantic-web@w3.org>

Hmm, so you did not the person who wrote the original mail and claimed 
to be "Etan Wexler" (the one with the group email as from), right?

This are the headers of the private reply I've got this morning:

Return-Path: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received: from chenab.cosmoweb.net (chenab.cosmoweb.net [66.234.224.15])
	by gonza.gmuer.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBN2jYdo019425
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <reto@gmuer.ch>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:45:37 +0100
Received: (qmail 28892 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2005 22:08:41 -0500
Received: from 71-255-234-66.cosmoweb.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (66.234.255.71)
  by 192.168.2.15 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2005 22:08:41 -0500
Message-ID: <43AB6A56.8060209@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:09:10 -0500
From: Etan Wexler <semantic-web@w3.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird/1.5


This are the ones in the mail I've got from you

Return-Path: <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Received: from chenab.cosmoweb.net (chenab.cosmoweb.net [66.234.224.15])
	by gonza.gmuer.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBNGDhBO003792
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <reto@gmuer.ch>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:13:58 +0100
Received: (qmail 24121 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2005 11:36:52 -0500
Received: from 71-255-234-66.cosmoweb.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (66.234.255.71)
  by 192.168.2.15 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2005 11:36:52 -0500
Message-ID: <43AC27BF.9060906@stickdog.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:37:19 -0500
From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird/1.5


Interpretations? (Most competence in the email-header domain I expect 
from the other Ethan, but I don't have his email (well probably I do, 
but don't know which one) ;-)

reto


Etan Wexler schrieb:

>
> Hello, Reto. Hello, Etan. This here is Etan.
>
> I wonder why Etan would assume the address of a public mailing list. 
> Consider this a solicitation for explanation.
>
Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 17:32:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 February 2013 14:24:52 GMT