> I find this a surprising assertion, as object oriented, strongly, > statically typed code is hugely important in enterprise > programming, whereas Lisp is used but rarely. Personally, I view > RDF as more along the lines of Python or similar important dynamic, > strongly typed languages -- we can play fast and loose with it in > many ways, using duck typing, but the types are still there to > exploit when useful. N.B. that this is very true of Lisp, too. Considering I'm using Lisp + RDF in an enterprise setting, I consider myself qualified on this issue, and I agree with the original assertion. I've been doing a lot of work in this area, and the OO/duck-typing analogy is promising. -RReceived on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:31:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:49 GMT