Hi Frank, > b. No point in being critical. Google already *had* a central Web > data repository. All they're doing is adding structured data to it, and > doing it in a "distributed" way (by asking everyone to contribute to > it). This seems a reasonable variant of the basic SW idea. The fact > that it is centrally *stored* should be just a technicality, provided > the data is freely accessible. Yes. I think free access to the data is the central point. When I read the press about Google Base threatening eBay and other market places or when I read stuff like Tim O'Reilly's "Data is the Next Intel Inside" (http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20. html?page=3) I'm wondering if Google's business model can be to give everybody free access to the data? Up till now, they only provide an HTML interface but no API. Anybody a clue if they are going to change this? I doubt it and that is the problem. > c. We should be *very* happy that Google is promoting the idea of > publishing structured data on the Web (maybe this will prod others into > taking this more seriously than they are now). I totally agree with you here. ChrisReceived on Monday, 5 December 2005 16:32:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:49 GMT