Thank you Karl Conflict is in the eye of the beholder (!) in the sense that given proper data representation conflict can be resolved before it arises, but I understand often data comes 'as is', fact of life, Even What we call 'facts' however , have a logical correlation, more than one logical correlation even If we organise that right, then the inference paths to planning is bound to be less conflictive than if we didnt I would suggest adding a 'reasoning' element to the algorithm As to how to represent that in rdf, that will simply follow, I hope will continue discussion on blog Pdm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org> To: <semantic-web@w3.org> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:10 PM Subject: Re: Schedule and Events Conflicts Management in RDF FYI: About the Schedule and Events thingy Le 05-08-25 à 15:02, Karl Dubost a écrit : > I see your point. Just note. I'm not trying to address the descriptive > note of the movies but more the conflicts between events. > Let me take a practical example I have continued my thinking process there: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2005Aug/0015 I explained one possible algorithm to solve the organization of the events. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Saturday, 27 August 2005 03:34:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:07 GMT