- From: Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
I have also verified and tested this change. Thank you very much, Josh > On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:57 AM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote: > > In [1], Josh Spiegel requested that the schema for serialization parameters > eliminate a nested union that slipped in despite his request that we get > rid of them (probably due to my misunderstanding the nature of the problem; > my apologies). > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Aug/0000.html > > On today's call I took an action to do that (number not yet known). > > The revised schema is at [2], and a small test file is at [3]. I have confirmed > that the change just made to the schema does not change the validity of any > of the individual elements in the test documents. (The change or non-change > in status described in the comments is from the version of the schema from > the published draft, before the current sequence of changes started.) > > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xslt-xquery-serialization-31/src/schema-for-serialization-parameters.xsd > [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xslt-xquery-serialization-31/src/schema-test.xml > > I believe this discharges the action. > > -- > **************************************************************** > * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC > * http://www.blackmesatech.com > * http://cmsmcq.com/mib > * http://balisage.net > **************************************************************** > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2016 21:57:50 UTC